Skip to the numbers
Your Water Numbers

Your water / The tap report

The tap report, read one line at a time

10 lines

from the 2025 report, each shown for both plants

WSSC Water’s quality report for 2025 lists yearly averages by plant, and on the 10 lines here the Potomac reads equal or higher except pH, which is 7.3 against Patuxent’s 7.5.

By the Your Water Numbers desk, not WSSC Water · Updated · How we check

Look up a line: yearly averages for each plant, 2025

LinePatuxentPotomacNote
Hardness, mg/L70 (58–86)154 (79–213)Moderately hard, hard
Calcium, mg/L19 (15–25)46 (29–60)Part of hardness
Alkalinity, mg/L3883Resists pH change
pH7.57.3Secondary range 6.5–8.5
Sodium, mg/L1622No limit in what we read
Chloride, mg/L4351Secondary limit 250
Residual chlorine, mg/L1.32.0Minimum 0.2
Fluoride, mg/L0.70.7SMCL 2
Nitrate, mg/L0.81.0Limit 10
Conductance, µS/cm241437TDS isn’t listed

Source: WSSC Water 2025 tap water analysis report · 2025 yearly averages

Reading this: Each cell is a yearly average, with a range in brackets where we have one. A plant average is not a reading from your faucet.

Green water towers rising above pines near Beltsville, with snow along the road in front
Water towers near Beltsville, Prince George’s County.

Which lines have a limit beside them?

Four here have a stated limit or standard. Nitrate sits at 0.8 and 1.0 against a limit of 10. Fluoride is 0.7 at both plants against a secondary level of 2. Chloride runs 43 and 51 against a secondary limit of 250.

pH of 7.5 and 7.3 falls inside the secondary range of 6.5–8.5. Secondary limits mostly concern taste, look and feel. Residual chlorine works the other way round, with a minimum of 0.2 that both plants clear.

Why does the Potomac read higher on most lines?

The two plants draw from different rivers, and the Potomac runs higher on minerals in these figures. Conductance shows it in one number: 437 µS/cm against 241. Conductance rises with dissolved minerals.

Potomac water carries more hardness, calcium, chloride and sodium than Patuxent water
Hardness, Potomac154
mg/L
Hardness, Patuxent70
mg/L
Chloride, Potomac51
mg/L
Calcium, Potomac46
mg/L
Chloride, Patuxent43
mg/L
Sodium, Potomac22
mg/L
Calcium, Patuxent19
mg/L
Sodium, Patuxent16
mg/L

Source: WSSC Water 2025 tap water analysis report · 2025 yearly averages

What does the chlorine line mean for taste?

It means disinfectant is meant to be there. Residual chlorine averaged 1.3 at Patuxent and 2.0 at Potomac, with a required minimum of 0.2. Taste is a personal call, and it isn’t a safety signal in these figures.

If it bothers you, a carbon filter is the usual household answer. If the water tastes fine, skip it. Neither link below is a lead recommendation, and no line in this table makes either one necessary.

Can you read hardness from the calcium line?

Partly. Calcium is one piece of hardness and the two move in the same direction, 19 and 46 against 70 and 154. The full story is on our hardness page, including the grains conversion, and on what hard water does to a heater.

What’s missing from the lines we list?

Three things worth knowing. TDS isn’t listed, so conductance is the nearest stand-in. Lead sits in a separate report, the 2025 Water Quality Report, covered on our lead page. PFAS has its own results page.

The report also can’t speak to your pipes. What happens between the main and your glass is a separate question, and who owns which pipe covers the first step.

Why won’t your own test match these?

Because these are yearly averages at the plant level, and yours is one sample at one tap. Hardness alone ranges from 79 to 213 on the Potomac. A home reading inside the range agrees with the report, even if it’s far from 154.

What to do with this number

  • Find your plant, then read that column only
  • Check a filter’s claim against the line it targets
  • Use the lead and PFAS pages for those two questions

Questions on this page

Is sodium at 22 mg/L a concern?

We read no limit for it, so we don’t rate it. Anyone on a sodium-restricted diet should show the number to their doctor.

Why does the chlorine figure differ between plants?

The report gives the averages without a reason in the lines we read: 1.3 at Patuxent and 2.0 at Potomac. Both are above the 0.2 minimum.

Is fluoride added or natural here?

The lines we read give only the level, 0.7 at both plants, against a secondary level of 2.

Where each number comes from

FigureWhat it isSourceAs of
70, 154 mg/LHardness, yearly averages and rangeWSSC Water 2025 tap report2025
19, 46; 38, 83Calcium and alkalinityWSSC Water 2025 tap report2025
7.5, 7.3; 6.5–8.5pH and secondary rangeWSSC Water 2025 tap report2025
16, 22; 43, 51; 250Sodium, chloride, chloride limitWSSC Water 2025 tap report2025
1.3, 2.0; 0.2Residual chlorine and minimumWSSC Water 2025 tap report2025
0.7; 2; 0.8, 1.0; 10Fluoride, nitrate and their levelsWSSC Water 2025 tap report2025
241, 437 µS/cmConductanceWSSC Water 2025 tap report2025